Movable Barrier Imminent Motion Notification System and Method

ABSTRACT

A movable barrier operator system is provided that includes a moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus, a motor, a controller, and communication circuitry configured to communicate with a remote control. In response to the communication circuitry receiving a communication from the remote control, the controller causes the motor to change the state of the movable barrier and additionally operate the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus upon a determination of the remote control being beyond a physical proximity of a location associated with the movable barrier operator system. Upon a determination that the remote control is within the physical proximity, the controller refrains from operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/257,045, filed Jan. 24, 2019, entitled MOVABLE BARRIER IMMINENT MOTION NOTIFICATION SYSTEM AND METHOD, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein.

FIELD

This disclosure relates generally to a movable barrier operator and, more specifically, to a movable barrier operator system with a moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus.

BACKGROUND

Movable barrier operators for controlling various types of barriers such as garage doors, gates, and the like are well known in the art. Some users operate these movable barrier operators using a local remote control, such as a handheld transmitter, to send a command message to open or close a movable barrier. Movable barrier operators may also receive command messages from a remote server via the internet in response to a state change request from a remote device to allow for remote operation by a user. For example, a user may control a movable barrier operator through a website accessed by a computing device or via an application on a smartphone.

When a user operates a movable barrier operator using a remote device via a network, such as the internet, the operation is typically classified as an unattended operation. Given the potential distance between the user operating a movable barrier operator through a remote device and the movable barrier itself, the user may be unaware of any individuals or pets located near the movable barrier prior to an open or close operation. In such systems, an unattended operation initiated by a remote device is performed by outputting an imminent motion notification during a delay in operation, and movement of the movable barrier after expiration of the delay. The imminent motion notification may be at least one of a flashing light and a sound alert to warn nearby individuals that the movable barrier will open or close.

Additionally, if a user operates a movable barrier using a local transmitter, the operation is classified as an attended operation which does not require an imminent motion notification. Given the short radio range of a transmitter, an imminent motion notification is generally thought to be unnecessary because the user is likely in view of the movable barrier after actuating the transmitter.

However, such methods do not account for the possibility that a user may operate the movable barrier operator using a remote device via a network when the user is near the movable barrier. For example, a user may attempt to open or close a garage door using a smartphone while in a driveway, or inside the associated garage. In these situations, the movable barrier operator system would automatically classify the operation as an unattended close (because the command message was received via a network) such that one or more of delayed operation of the movable barrier operator, flashing a light, and generating a sound alert occur, which may result in frustration by or inconvenience to a user because the notification is not required.

Further, the radio range of local transmitters continues to increase due to advances in technology. As such, a user may potentially be able to operate a local transmitter from a distance that would ordinarily entail an imminent motion notification because the user may no longer be in view of the movable barrier. In this situation, the imminent motion notification apparatus would not operate simply because a local transmitter was used, which may surprise individuals or pets near the movable barrier who are unaware that the movable barrier may soon close.

SUMMARY

In one aspect of the present disclosure, a movable barrier operator system is provided that includes a motor, communication circuitry configured to communicate with a remote control, and a controller operably coupled to the motor and the communication circuitry. Upon the communication circuitry receiving a communication from the remote control, the controller is configured to cause the motor to change a state of the movable barrier. The movable barrier operator system further includes a moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus operably coupled to the controller. The moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus is configured to output an alert in combination with the change of state of the movable barrier upon a determination of the remote control being beyond a physical proximity of a location associated with the movable barrier operator system. Upon a determination that the remote control is within the physical proximity, however, the controller refrains from operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus in combination with the change of state of the movable barrier.

In some embodiments, the proximity determination may be performed by the controller of the movable barrier operator system. As other examples, the proximity determination may be performed by a processor of the remote control or by a processor of a server computer associated with the movable barrier operator system and communicated to the communication circuitry of the movable barrier operator.

By performing a proximity determination prior to operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus, devices such as car visor-mounted transmitters may utilize an increased range of operation while still providing an imminent motion notification upon a determination that the remote control is beyond the physical proximity from the location associated with the movable barrier operator system. Additionally, if the remote control is determined to be within the physical proximity, then the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus does not operate, and unnecessary imminent motion notifications can be minimized or prevented.

The proximity determination may be based on at least one or more of the following methods for obtaining proximity-related information of the remote control including, but not limited to, dead reckoning determinations, angle of arrival measurements, time of flight determinations, received signal strength indication (RSSI) thresholding, comparison of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) data such as global positioning satellite (GPS) data, analysis of data obtained via remote sensors, LiDAR scanning, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments, proximity-related data of the remote control may be obtained from multiple sources and combined using sensor fusion algorithms to increase the accuracy of the proximity determination.

In accordance with another aspect of the present disclosure, a remote control for a movable barrier operator system is provided. The remote control includes communication circuitry configured to send a communication to the movable barrier operator system to change a state of the movable barrier. The communication circuitry is also capable of receiving or transmitting a locating indicium for determination of whether the remote control is within or beyond a physical proximity of a location associated with the movable barrier operator system. The remote control further includes a user interface configured to receive a user input that indicates a request to change the state of the movable barrier and a processor operatively coupled to the communication circuitry and the user interface. In response to a determination that the remote control is located beyond the physical proximity, the processor causes the communication circuitry to send the communication to the movable barrier operator system to change the state of the movable barrier. The processor is configured to inhibit operation of the moving-barrier imminent notification apparatus in combination with the change of state of the movable barrier upon a determination of the remote control being within the physical proximity. The processor is further configured to effectuate operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification in combination with the change of state of the movable barrier upon a determination of the remote control being beyond the physical proximity.

In yet another aspect of the present disclosure, a server computer for facilitating operation by a remote control of a movable barrier operator system is provided. The server computer communicates via a communication interface with both the movable barrier operator system and the remote control over a network, such as the internet, and can receive a state change request from the remote control to change the state of the movable barrier. A processor of the server computer is operatively coupled to the communication interface and is configured to cause the communication interface to communicate with the movable barrier operator system and cause a change of state of the movable barrier upon the communication interface receiving the state change request. The processor is further configured to cause the communication interface to communicate with the movable barrier operator system and inhibit operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus in combination with the change of state of the movable barrier operator upon a determination of the remote control being within a physical proximity of a location associated with the movable barrier operator system. Conversely, the processor is configured to cause the communication interface to communicate with the movable barrier operator system and effectuate operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus in combination with the change of state upon a determination of the remote control being beyond the physical proximity.

This disclosure likewise provides for a method of operating a movable barrier operator system having a moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus. The method includes receiving a communication from a remote control that causes the movable barrier operator system to change the state of a movable barrier. The method includes causing the moving-barrier imminent notification apparatus to output an alert in combination with the change of state of the movable barrier upon a determination of the remote control being beyond a physical proximity of a location associated with the movable barrier operator system. Further, upon a determination that the remote control is within the physical proximity, the method includes causing the moving-barrier imminent notification apparatus to refrain from outputting an alert in combination with the change of state of the movable barrier.

In another aspect, a method is provided of operating a movable barrier operator system using a remote control. The method includes receiving a user input at a user interface of the remote control, the user input requesting a change of state of a movable barrier of the movable barrier operator system. The remote control is configured, in response to the user input, to output a communication to cause the movable barrier operator system to change a state of the movable barrier. The method includes communicating at least one locating indicium for determination or indication of whether the remote control is within or beyond a physical proximity of a location associated with the movable barrier operator system. The communication circuitry of the remote control sends a communication to the movable barrier operator system. The method includes effecting operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus in combination with the change of state of the movable barrier upon a determination of the remote control being beyond (e.g., relative to the at least one locating indicium) a physical proximity of the location associated with the movable barrier operator system. The method further includes inhibiting operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus in combination with the change of state of the movable barrier upon a determination of the remote control being within (e.g., relative to the at least one locating indicium) the physical proximity.

In accordance with yet another aspect of this disclosure, a non-transitory computer readable medium is provided having instructions stored thereon. When executed by a computer, the instructions cause the computer to perform operations including receiving a communication including a state change request from a remote control. The state change request is configured to cause a change of state of a movable barrier of a movable barrier operator system. The operations include effecting operation of a moving-barrier imminent notification apparatus in combination with the change of state of the movable barrier upon a determination of the remote control being beyond a physical proximity of a location associated with the movable barrier operator system. The operations further include inhibiting operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus in combination with the change of state of the movable barrier upon a determination that the remote control is within the physical proximity.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an example movable barrier operator system in communication with various remote controls;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the movable barrier operator system of FIG. 1 showing a moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus of the movable barrier operator system;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of one of the remote controls of FIG. 1;

FIG. 4 is a schematic view of an example server computer for facilitating operation of the movable barrier operator of FIG. 1;

FIG. 5 is a flow chart of an example method for operating a movable barrier operator system having a moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus;

FIG. 6 is a flow chart of an example method for operating, by a remote control, a movable barrier operator system having a moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus; and

FIG. 7 is a flow chart of an example method for operating, by a server computer, a movable barrier operator system having a moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus.

Elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions and/or relative positioning of some of the elements in the figures may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help to improve understanding of various embodiments of the present teachings. Also, common but well-understood elements that are useful or necessary in a commercially feasible embodiment are often not depicted in order to facilitate a less obstructed view of these various embodiments of the present teachings. Certain actions and/or operations may be described or depicted in a particular order of occurrence while those skilled in the art will understand that such specificity with respect to sequence is not actually required. The terms and expressions used herein have the ordinary technical meaning as is accorded to such terms and expressions by persons skilled in the technical field as set forth above except where different specific meanings have otherwise been set forth herein. The word “or” when used herein shall be interpreted as having a disjunctive construction rather than a conjunctive construction unless otherwise specifically indicated.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring now to the drawings, FIG. 1 shows a movable barrier operator system 10 including a movable barrier operator 12 and a moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14. The movable barrier operator 12 is shown mounted to the ceiling of a garage 16 and controls the position of a movable barrier 18. The movable barrier operator 12 further includes a motor 260, communication circuitry 250, and a controller 255 (See FIG. 2). The movable barrier operator system 10 includes a rail 20 and trolley 22. The trolley 22 has an arm 24 that is connected to the movable barrier 18. A coupling 25 such as a belt or chain connects the trolley 22 to an output (e.g. drive shaft or transmission) of the motor 260. The movable barrier 18 is positioned for movement along a pair of door tracks 26, 28. In response to receiving a command message from a remote control 30, such as a handheld transmitter 32, the movable barrier operator 12 changes the state of the movable barrier 18. For example, the movable barrier operator 12 moves the movable barrier 18 from an open position to a closed position and vice versa.

The communication circuitry 250 of the movable barrier operator 12 is configured to communicate with one or more remote controls 30. The one or more remote controls 30 may include, for example, a wall-mounted keypad 31, a handheld transmitter 32, a mobile communication device 34 (such as a smartphone), a remote computer 36 (such as a desktop or laptop), or a vehicle integral (e.g., HomeLink®-style) transmitter 38, or a security system associated with the garage 16. The one or more remote controls 30 are configured to communicate directly or indirectly with the movable barrier operator 12 to effect a change of the state of the movable barrier 18. The remote controls 30 may send a communication that includes at least: an identifier portion to identify the remote control 30 sending the communication; and a rolling code portion that changes with each command message sent by the remote control 30. For example, the handheld transmitter 32 may send a communication that may be a radio frequency signal including a command message having an identifier portion and a rolling code portion.

The remote controls 30 may communicate directly with the movable barrier operator 12, such as with radio frequency signals. Alternatively or additionally, the remote controls 30 may communicate indirectly with the movable barrier operator 12 such as via a network 44 and a server computer 40 (see FIG. 2). The network 44 may include wired or wireless networks (or a combination thereof), for example, the internet or a local area network. For example, the handheld transmitter 32 may communicate directly with the movable barrier operator 12 via radio frequency signals such that when the handheld transmitter 32 is out of range, the movable barrier operator 12 will not receive a communication from the handheld transmitter 32 and will not effect movement of the movable barrier 18. However, the mobile communication device 34, such as a smartphone, may instead communicate indirectly with the movable barrier operator 12 to effectively increase the range of operation. Specifically, the mobile communication device 34 communicates a state change request to the server computer 40 and the server computer 40 communicates a command message to the movable barrier operator 12 via the network 44. Similarly, a remote computer 36 or a security system 38 may communicate indirectly with the movable barrier operator 12 via the network 44 and the server computer 40.

Upon receiving the command message, the movable barrier operator 12 changes the state of the movable barrier 18. The movable barrier operator 12 may additionally be configured to communicate with one or more peripheral devices. For example, the communication circuitry 250 may include one or more antennae to facilitate communication with one or more remote sensors 70, a WiFi router or access point, and other devices, as will be discussed further hereinafter.

Regarding FIG. 1, the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 is integrated with the movable barrier operator 12 on the ceiling of the garage 16. The moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 may alternatively or additionally be separate or distinct from the movable barrier operator 12 and located in other areas proximate the movable barrier 18, such as a wall of the garage 16 or on the ceiling of the garage 16.

The moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 is configured to provide an imminent motion notification that typically includes a visual alert, a sound alert, a partial movement of the barrier, or a combination thereof, followed by or concurrent with delayed movement of the movable barrier 18. In one embodiment, the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 is configured to cause the controller 255 of the movable barrier operator 12 to use a timer to delay operation of the motor 260 for a short period of time, for example, five seconds or more before a change of state of the movable barrier 18. Additionally, the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 may include a speaker 15 for emitting an audible alert for a short period of time, for example, five seconds or more before a change of state of the movable barrier 18. For example, the audible alert may include a continuous high-pitched tone, an intermittent beeping, or the like, that may be heard by nearby individuals. The moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 may provide a visual alert by causing the controller 255 to operate an overhead light 42 of the movable barrier operator 12. For example, the visual alert may include flashing or strobing the overhead light 42 for a short period of time, for example, five seconds or more before a change of state of the movable barrier 18. So configured, the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 provides an imminent motion notification to alert individuals near the movable barrier 18 prior to a change of state operation.

Regarding FIGS. 1 and 2, the movable barrier operator system 10 moves the movable barrier 18 with or without operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 depending on whether a particular remote control of the remote controls 30 has been actuated and is within a physical proximity of a location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10. In one embodiment, the location 80 may be a geofenced area 90 outside of the garage 16. The user's home may have a driveway extending between the garage 16 and a street and the geofenced area 90 may be, for example, a portion of the street. FIG. 1 shows a vehicle 100 that is driving through the geofenced area 90 toward the garage 16.

For example, the movable barrier operator system 10 includes communication circuitry 250 configured to receive a communication from a remote control 30 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10. Upon the communication circuitry 250 receiving the communication, the controller 255 of the movable barrier operator 12 is configured to cause the motor 260 to effect movement of the movable barrier 18. Upon a determination of the remote control 30 being beyond the physical proximity of the location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10, the controller 255 additionally operates the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14. However, upon the remote control 30 being determined to be located within the physical proximity of the location 80, then the controller 255 will cause the motor 260 to operate the movable barrier 18 without effecting operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14.

The controller 255 need not operate the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 upon the remote control 30 being within the physical proximity of the location 80 because the remote control 30 is substantially within a line of sight of the movable barrier 18 such that the operation is considered an attended operation. The movable barrier operator system 10 thereby makes a determination of whether to operate the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 based on the location of the remote control 30 rather than making the determination based solely on the type of remote control 30 (for example, whether the remote control is a local transmitter or a remote device). This avoids potential inconvenience or frustration of experiencing the delay, flashing light, and sound alarm of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 when, for example, the user utilizes a mobile communication device 34 in a driveway of garage 16.

As used herein, physical proximity refers to a geographic relationship between the remote control 30 and the location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10 as discussed above. For example, physical proximity may refer to a threshold distance set by a user to be compared to an absolute measured distance between GPS coordinates of the remote control 30 and GPS coordinates of the location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10 to determine whether to operate the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14. As one example in this regard, the location 80 may be the location of the garage 16. Whether the remote control 30 is within the physical proximity of the location 80 is determined by comparing the absolute distance between the remote control 30 and the location 80 to a threshold distance. As another example, the location 80 may be defined as a bounded area (e.g., geofenced area 90) associated with the movable barrier operator system 10, and physical proximity may refer to the remote control 30 being located within the bounded area.

The proximity between the remote control 30 and movable barrier 18 may, in some cases, be represented by a route other than a direct path. For example, some routes that a user in a vehicle 100 with the remote control 30 may be required to take to arrive within a substantial line of sight of the movable barrier 18 may be lengthy or convoluted such as a winding street, a one-way street, or a circuitous route in a gated community. In those instances, the remote control 30 may be determined to be within the absolute threshold distance of the location 80, but the remote control 30 may still not be in a substantial line of sight of the movable barrier 18 such that an imminent barrier notification is still output in combination with a change of state operation. For example, if the location 80 is the location of the garage 16, the remote control 30 may be located one street over from the movable barrier 18 in a dense subdivision and not be in a substantial line of sight of the movable barrier 18 even though the remote control 30 is relatively close to the garage 16. To address this, whether the remote control 30 is within the physical proximity of the location 80 may be determined by first determining a distance the vehicle 100 carrying the remote control 30 would have to travel along one or more roads to arrive at the location 80. This vehicle travel distance may be retrieved real-time from a navigation system of the vehicle 100 or the remote control 30 or, as another example, may be predicted based on the current location of the vehicle 100 or remote control 30 and a known vehicle travel distance between the current location and the location 80. Next, the travel distance is compared to a threshold travel distance to determine whether the remote control 30 is within the physical proximity of the location 80.

In some embodiments where location 80 is defined as a bounded area, the location of the remote control 30 may be determined at multiple intervals within location 80 to predictively determine whether the remote control 30 is moving nearer or farther away from the movable barrier 18. If the determination indicates that the remote control 30 is moving towards the movable barrier 18, operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 may not be required. However, if the determination indicates that the remote control 30 is moving away from the movable barrier 18, even if the remote control 30 is still within the area, operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 may nevertheless be required. For example, the GPS coordinates of the remote control 30, as the remote control 30 enters the bounds of the location 80, may be used to determine a direction of travel of the vehicle 100 including the remote control 30.

A user may define the geofenced area 90 using, for example, the remote computer 36. The geofenced area 90 may be defined as a driveway associated with the garage 16, the street address of a house including the garage 16, or the boundaries of the garage 16 itself, among others. The location 80 may alternatively be defined as a set of latitude and longitude coordinates. For example, if the remote control 30 includes an in-vehicle human machine interface (such as infotainment system 72) connected to a universal transmitter, the human-machine interface may prompt a driver to press a virtual button during setup to allow the global positioning satellite (GPS) system of the vehicle 100 to identify the location of the garage 16 or driveway associated therewith. The GPS location may then be saved in a memory of the human-machine interface for subsequent operation and may be communicated to the movable barrier operator 12 or server computer 40.

By way of example, in a densely packed urban area, the bounds of the geofenced area 90 may be defined by the user as the street on which garage 16 is located. This would effectively preclude operation of the movable barrier 18 by the remote control 30 without operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 from locations where the remote control 30 may be within an absolute threshold distance from the movable barrier 18, but may not have a substantial line of sight of the movable barrier 18 (for example, one street over from the garage 16 or a nearby alleyway). In this embodiment, physical proximity refers to whether the GPS coordinates of the remote control 30 indicate that the remote control 30 is within the bounds of the geofenced area 90 as defined by a user.

In some embodiments, the determination of whether the remote control 30 is within the physical proximity of the location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10 may be made by the controller 255 of the movable barrier operator 12. The controller 255 may include a memory 265 that comprises a non-transitory computer-readable medium. The controller 255 may also include a processor 285 operably coupled to the memory 265 and configured to execute computer-readable instructions stored in the memory 265.

The controller 255 may be configured to determine whether the remote control 30 is within the physical proximity of the location 80 based at least in part on data obtained by any technique for obtaining proximity-related information of the remote control 30 including, but not limited to, dead reckoning determinations, angle of arrival measurements, time of flight measurements, received signal strength indication (RSSI) thresholding, comparison of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) data such as GPS data, analysis of data obtained from one or more remote sensors 70, LiDAR scanning, LORAN or a combination thereof. Alternatively, the communication circuitry 250 may receive data representative of a proximity determination already made by another device such as, for example, a processor 355 (See FIG. 3) of the remote control 30 or a processor 455 (See FIG. 4) of the server computer 40.

For example, the controller 255 may determine whether the remote control 30 is located within or beyond the physical proximity of the location 80 through RSSI thresholding. The signal strength of a radio frequency communication from the remote control 30 will decrease as the distance between the remote control 30 and location 80 increases. In this embodiment, the controller 255 of the movable barrier operator 12 may include the memory 265 for storing a threshold signal strength corresponding with a physical distance between the remote control 30 and the location 80 wherein an imminent motion notification would typically be output. Upon the communication circuitry 250 receiving a radio frequency communication from a remote control 30, the controller 255 is configured to retrieve the threshold signal strength from the memory 265 and compare the received signal strength of the communication with the threshold signal strength. Upon the comparison indicating that the received signal strength of the communication is below the threshold, the remote control 30 is determined to be beyond the physical proximity, and the controller 255 will effect operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 in combination with a change of state of the movable barrier 18. Conversely, when the received signal strength is above the threshold, the controller 255 will not effect operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14, and will instead operate the movable barrier 18 without an imminent motion notification.

In embodiments where the proximity determination is calculated by an angle of arrival of the communication from the remote control 30, at least two sensors 270, 271 having antennae may be associated with the movable barrier operator system 10. Upon the remote control 30 communicating the command message to the communication circuitry 250 of the movable barrier operator 12, the controller 255 is configured to determine a direction and distance of the remote control 30 relative to the sensors 270, 271 based at least in part on the time of arrival of the command message at each individual sensor 270, 271. The direction and the distance determined using the angle of arrival sensors 270, 271 may then be used either alone or in combination with other proximity-related information by the controller 255 to perform the proximity determination and determine whether the remote control 30 is located within or beyond the physical proximity of the location 80.

The movable barrier operator 12 may also include one or more time of flight sensors 272. Each time of flight sensor 272 may employ a variety of signals including, but not limited to, ultrasound/ultrasonic and infrared signals for determining whether the remote control 30 is within or beyond the physical proximity of the location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10. For example, the time of flight sensor 272 may emit infrared light at a first time, T₁, which may be reflected by a vehicle 100 (see FIG. 1) including the mobile communication device 34, and received back at the time of flight sensor 272 at a second time, T₂. The controller 255 may then perform a time of flight calculation based at least in part on the time between T₁ and T₂ to approximate the distance between the time of flight sensor 272 and the vehicle 100 including the remote control 30. The controller 255 may then compare that distance to a threshold distance stored in the memory 265 to determine whether the remote control 30 is within or beyond the physical proximity of the location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10. Phase shift or frequency shift of an emitted signal from time of flight sensor 272 and a reflected/received signal may additionally or alternatively be employed for the determination of physical proximity.

A variety of remote sensors 70 may be used to obtain data for determining whether the vehicle 100 including the remote control 30 is within or beyond the physical proximity of the location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10. For example, an optical emitter and an optical detector may be located on opposing sides of a driveway and may be used to determine whether vehicle 100 including the remote control 30 is positioned thereupon. For example, if vehicle 100 including the remote control 30 interrupts a light beam between the optical emitter and optical detector, the emitter and/or detector may communicate with the communication circuitry 250 of the movable barrier operator 12 to indicate that the remote control 30 is within the physical proximity. To prevent false positives associated with other objects interrupting the light beam, such as a dog or child, the controller 255 may only inhibit operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 if the light beam is interrupted within a defined time period after a user sends a command message using the remote control 30. For example, if the light beam is not interrupted within 1-3 milliseconds upon the communication circuitry 250 receiving the radio frequency communication from the remote control 30, then the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 will operate and provide an imminent motion notification.

Additionally, the remote sensors 70 may be integrated as part of a connected or “smart” city. For example, a number of different remote sensors 70 may be used to determine the location of the vehicle 100 including the remote control 30 as the vehicle 100 traverses through the city. The vehicle 100 including the remote control 30 may include an emitter 74 for emitting a radio frequency beacon signal having a unique identifier associated with the vehicle 100 such that a remote sensor 70 may detect the beacon signal. Such a remote sensor 70 may be located, for example, in streetlights, street signs, on a building, or other fixed or mobile devices configured for vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V), vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I), vehicle-to-anything (V2X) communications and the like. Once the beacon signal is detected, the identity of the remote sensor 70 and an indication that the remote sensor 70 detected the vehicle 100 is communicated to the communication circuitry 250 of the movable barrier operator 12. The controller 255 may then determine the location of the vehicle 100 based at least in part on the location of the remote sensor 70 stored in the memory 265.

The remote sensor 70 may also include an optical sensor configured to detect a light emitted by the remote control 30 or by the vehicle 100. The remote control 30 may include a light emitter to emit light in response to a user interacting with the user interface 352 of the remote control 30 such that the optical sensor may detect the emitted light. The remote sensor 70 may then communicate to the communication circuitry 250 that the light was detected by the optical sensor of the remote sensor 70, thus indicating that the remote control 30 is in an unobstructed line of sight of the movable barrier 18 and causing the controller 255 to not operate the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14.

As another example, the remote sensor 70 may be a camera such as a closed-circuit television camera that may be located at various intersections throughout a city, and a processor associated therewith may determine the relative location of a vehicle 100 including a remote control 30 based at least in part using image recognition technology. Additionally, the location of the camera or cameras may be stored in the memory 265 of the movable barrier operator 12. For example, the remote control 30 may be integrated in the vehicle 100 and the vehicle 100 has a unique license plate that may be identified by the processor associated with the camera to determine that the vehicle 100 is near the camera. An indication of the vehicle 100 being in proximity to the camera may then be transmitted to the communication circuitry 250 of the movable barrier operator 12. Based on the location of the camera that has been stored in the memory 265, the controller 255 can determine the location of the vehicle 100. If the location of the vehicle 100 including the remote control 30 is determined to be beyond the physical proximity of the location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10, the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 will operate in combination with any change in state of the movable barrier 18.

In one embodiment, the communication circuitry 250 includes a wireless short-range communication interface 275 configured to communicate with the remote control 30 based on a paired relationship. The wireless short-range communication interface 275 may utilize one or more protocols including Zigbee, Z-Wave, Bluetooth (or Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)), Near Field Communications (NFC), Long Terminal Repeat (LTR), Wi-Fi, WiMAX, or other proprietary or public wireless communication methods. During setup of the remote control 30, the remote control 30 may be paired to the wireless short-range communication interface 275 such that pairing information is retained to provide a connection therebetween automatically when the remote control 30 is within the connection range of the interface 275. The connection range of the interface 275 may be selected such that a connection between the interface 275 and the remote control 30 indicates that the vehicle 100 including the remote control 30 is within the physical proximity of the location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10. So configured, the controller 255 may effect a change of state of the movable barrier 18 without operating the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 when the remote control 30 is connected to the interface 275.

By another approach, a LiDAR system 280 may be used to determine whether the remote control 30 is located within or beyond the physical proximity of the location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10. For example, the vehicle 100 including the remote control 30 may additionally include a LiDAR system 280 configured to sense surroundings using pulsed laser light and measure the reflected pulses to create a digital 3-D representation of the environment. So configured, the LiDAR system 280 may identify when the vehicle 100 is in view of the movable barrier 18 associated with the remote control 30. The LiDAR system 280 may then communicate a determination that the movable barrier 18 is in an unobstructed line of sight of the vehicle 100 to the remote control 30. The remote control 30 may in turn communicate with the communication circuitry 250 of the movable barrier operator 12 to indicate that the remote control 30 is within the physical proximity of the location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10 such that operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 is not required.

Determining whether the remote control 30 is within the physical proximity of the location 80 may also be based at least in part on global navigation satellite system (GNSS) data such as, for example, global positioning satellite (GPS) coordinates including a latitude and a longitude associated with the remote control 30. In one embodiment, the communication circuitry 350 of the remote control 30 includes a GPS receiver configured to receive data from GPS satellites that the GPS receiver or the controller 255 uses to determine the location of the remote control 30. By way of example, the location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10 may be the geofenced area 90 as shown in FIG. 1. When the GPS data indicates that the remote control 30 is outside of or beyond the geofenced area 90, the controller 255 of the movable barrier operator system 10 will effect operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 in combination with a change of state of the movable barrier 18. The latitude and longitude of the remote control 30 may be communicated directly to the communication circuitry 250 of the movable barrier operator 12, or may additionally or alternatively be sent to the server computer 40, which may then communicate the latitude and longitude to the communication circuitry 250.

In one embodiment, the memory 265 of the controller 255 is configured for storing a threshold distance corresponding with the physical proximity of the location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10. The controller 255 is configured to compare the threshold distance stored in the memory 265 to the distance measured between the remote control 30 and the location 80. For example, the distance between the remote control 30 and the location 80 may be determined using GPS data and comparing the latitude and longitude of the remote control 30 to the latitude and longitude of the location to determine the absolute distance therebetween. Additionally or alternatively, the distance between the remote control 30 and the location 80 may correspond to the distance the vehicle 100 including the remote control 30 will have to travel along one or more roads to reach the location 80. When the absolute distance between the remote control 30 and the location 80 is greater than the threshold distance, the controller 255 is configured to effect operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 in combination with a change in state of the movable barrier 18 in response the communication circuitry 250 receiving a communication. Additionally, the communication circuitry 255 is configured to receive a second, updated threshold distance from a remote server, such as server computer 40, when a user adjusts the threshold distance. The controller 255 is configured to store the updated threshold distance in the memory 265 for performing the next proximity determination. The receipt of an updated distance threshold may cause the controller 255 to remove the prior distance threshold from the memory 265.

Further, any number of techniques described herein for determining the proximity of the remote control 30 may be used in connection with one another to perform the proximity determination via a sensor fusion algorithm. For example, the proximity determination may rely on both RSSI thresholding in addition to comparison of GPS coordinates, or any other combination of proximity determining techniques to increase at least one of the accuracy, reliability, and precision of the proximity determination. In some embodiments, if even one of the techniques determines that the remote control 30 is beyond the physical proximity of the location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10, then operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 will still occur for the safety reasons discussed herein. For instance, in an example embodiment relying on both GPS coordinates and connection with the wireless short-range interface 275, even if the remote control 30 is connected to the interface 275, when the GPS coordinates indicate that the remote control 30 is beyond the physical proximity then the controller 255 will still effect operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 in combination with operation of the movable barrier 18.

In some embodiments, various other local and remote devices and components may perform the proximity determination in accordance with the above-discussed proximity determining techniques and communicate that determination to the communication circuitry 250 of the movable barrier operator 12. For instance, the server computer 40 or another computing device associated with the movable barrier operator system 10 may determine whether the remote control 30 is within or beyond the physical proximity of the location 80 and communicate the determination to the communication circuitry 250 of the movable barrier operator 12. Such remote determinations may then instruct the controller 255 whether to effect operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14. In other embodiments, a processor 355 (see FIG. 3) of the remote control 30 may be configured to perform the proximity determination and communicate that determination via communication circuitry 350 to the communication circuitry 250 of the movable barrier operator 12.

A loop detector may be used in the determination of whether the remote control 30 is within the physical proximity. The loop detector may determine whether the vehicle 100 including the remote control 30 is within the physical proximity based on, for example, changes in inductance or measuring changes in the earth's magnetic field when the vehicle 100 including the remote control 30 passes over a buried or in-pavement loop of the loop detector. An output signal from the loop detector indicating a determination that the remote control 30 is within the physical proximity may then be sent to the communication circuitry 250 of the movable barrier operator 12. Upon receiving a communication from the remote control 30 in conjunction with the loop detector indicating that the remote control 30 is within the physical proximity, the controller 255 effects a change of state of the movable barrier 18 without operating the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14.

With reference to FIG. 3, the communication circuitry 350 is configured to send a communication to the movable barrier operator 12 to effect movement of the movable barrier 18. For example, the communication circuitry 350 may include a radio frequency transmitter or transceiver configured to communicate with the movable barrier operator 12 via radio frequency signals in the 300 MHz to 900 MHz range. Alternatively or additionally, the communication circuitry 350 may include a wireless wide area network interface/device configured to communicate via cellular (for example, 3G, 4G, 4G LTE, 5G), Wi-MAX, LoRa, or other approaches.

The communication circuitry 350 is further configured to transmit or receive at least one locating indicium used in determining whether the remote control 30 is within the physical proximity of the location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10. The remote control 30 further includes a user interface 352 to receive a user input and, optionally, to provide information to the user.

The processor 355 is connected to the communication circuitry 350, the user interface 352, and a memory 365. The memory 365 comprises a non-transitory computer-readable medium that can store, for example, a fixed or static identifier of the remote control 30, a rolling code algorithm and a current rolling identifier, location data (for example, latitude and longitude coordinates of the geofence 90), or any combination thereof.

The processor 355 is configured to effect movement of the movable barrier 18 in combination with an imminent motion notification when the remote control 30 is determined to be beyond the physical proximity of the location 80. The processor 355 is configured to effect movement of the movable barrier 18 by, for example, causing the communication circuitry 350 to send a radio frequency communication directly to the movable barrier operator 12. Alternatively, the processor 355 may send a communication indirectly to the movable barrier operator 12 by causing the communication circuitry 350 to send a state change request to the server computer 40. In turn, the server computer 40 may then send a command message to the movable barrier operator 12 via the network 44.

The user interface 352 may include a display screen, one or more buttons, a microphone, a speaker, or a combination thereof. A user input at the user interface 352 may cause the processor 355 to cause the communication circuitry 350 to send a communication directly or indirectly to the movable barrier operator 12.

The determination of whether the remote control 30 is within or beyond the physical proximity of the location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10 may be performed by the processor 355 of the remote control 30. In one embodiment, the communication circuitry 350 of the remote control 30 may be configured to receive a locating indicium from an external device such as, for example, the server computer 40 or the movable barrier operator system 10. In another embodiment, the communication circuitry 350 of the remote control 30 is configured to transmit the locating indicium to the movable barrier operator 12, the server computer 40, and/or another device.

The at least one locating indicium transmitted or received by the communication circuitry 350 may include raw data obtained by any of the proximity techniques discussed above with respect to FIG. 2, among others, or data representing a determination of a location of the remote control 30. As other examples, the at least one locating indicium may include a signal associated with cell tower triangulation of the remote control 30 or an ultrasonic sound. The proximity determination may be based at least in part on any of the locating indicia described herein, among others.

Upon the processor 355 determining that the remote control 30 is within the physical proximity of the location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10, the communication circuitry 350 may communicate a non-notification instruction or indication to the communication circuitry 250 of the movable barrier operator. The communication that the remote control 30 sends to the movable barrier operator 12 to effect a change of state of the movable barrier may contain the non-notification instruction. In another approach, the non-notification instruction may be a separate communication.

The non-notification instruction is configured to instruct the controller 255 of the movable barrier operator 12 to not operate the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 when the movable barrier 18 is opened or closed. As another example, the controller 255 does not operate the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 unless the communication circuitry 250 receives a notification instruction from the remote control 30. The processor 355 may effect non-operation of the moving-barrier imminent notification apparatus 14 by not sending the notification instruction to the movable barrier operator 12.

In one embodiment, the communication circuitry 350 of the remote control 30 includes a global positioning satellite (GPS) receiver and the at least one locating indicium includes data from GPS satellites. Upon receiving the GPS data, the processor 355 of the remote control 30 may calculate the location of the remote control 30 and compare the calculated location with the location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10 to determine whether the remote control 30 is located within or beyond the physical proximity. The communication circuitry 350 of the remote control 30 may then communicate the proximity determination to the communication circuitry 250 of the movable barrier operator 12.

In another embodiment, the at least one locating indicium may include an ultrasonic signal. As another example, the remote control 30 may include an ultrasonic transmitter and the movable barrier operator 12 may include an ultrasonic receiver, or vice versa. To determine whether the remote control 30 is within or beyond the physical proximity of the location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10, either the remote control 30 or the movable barrier operator 12 may emit an ultrasonic signal which, if the remote control 30 is within the physical proximity, may be received and then analyzed to evaluate the distance between the remote control 30 and the movable barrier operator 12.

In one embodiment, the communication circuitry 350 of the remote control 30 communicates via a cellular or other wide-area or long-range network. The proximity determination may be based on triangulation data of the remote control 30. Specifically, the processor 355 of the remote control 30 may measure a time delay that a cellular signal takes to return from at least two cell towers associated with the cellular network. The processor 355 may then determine the location of the remote control 30 by comparing the time delays to the location of the cell towers. That location may in turn be used to determine whether the remote control is within or beyond the physical proximity of the location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10. The communication circuitry 350 may then communicate the proximity determination to the communication circuitry 250 of the movable barrier operator 12.

With reference to FIG. 4, the server computer 40 for facilitating operation by the remote control 30 of the movable barrier operator system 10 includes a communication interface 450, a processor 455, and a memory 465. The memory 465 comprises a non-transitory computer-readable medium that may be configured to store for example, threshold distances, threshold signal strengths, location data (for example, latitude and longitude coordinates of the geofence 90), and other data to be used in performing the proximity determination. The processor 455 may be configured to execute computer-readable instructions stored on the memory 465. The communication interface 450 is configured to communicate with the movable barrier operator system 10 and the remote control 30 via the network 44, such as the internet or a local area network, and may also receive a state change request from the remote control 30, the state change request configured to cause the server computer 40 to either open or close the movable barrier 18. When the communication interface 450 receives the state change request from the remote control 30, the processor 455 is configured to cause the communication interface 450 to communicate a command message to the movable barrier operator system 10. The command message is configured to effect a change in state of the movable barrier 18 in combination with operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 upon a determination that the remote control 30 is located beyond the physical proximity of the location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10.

In one embodiment, the proximity determination is performed by the processor 455 of the server computer 40 before communicating the command message to the movable barrier operator system 10. For example, the communication interface 450 of the server computer 40 may be configured to receive data representing one or more characteristics of the remote control 30, such as location data representing the physical location of the remote control 30. The location data can be raw data obtained by any of the proximity techniques discussed above with respect to FIGS. 2-3, or data representing a determined location. The location data should be understood to refer to data representing the physical location of the remote control 30 that is capable of being compared to the location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10 to determine whether the remote control 30 is within or beyond the physical proximity.

Alternatively, the location data could be representative of the determination of the remote control 30 being within or beyond the physical proximity made by, for example, the controller 255 or the processor 355, and then communicated to the communication circuitry 450 of the server computer 40. Upon receiving a determination that the remote control 30 is beyond the physical proximity, the processor 455 is configured to cause the communication interface 450 to communicate a command message including a non-notification signal to the communication circuitry 250 of the movable barrier operator 12 to effect a change in state of the movable barrier 18 without operating the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14.

With reference to FIG. 5, a method 500 is provided for operating the movable barrier operator 12. The method 500 includes the operation 510 of receiving at the movable barrier operator 12 a communication from the remote control 30 configured to change a state of the movable barrier 18. The method also includes the operation 520 of determining whether the remote control 30 is within or beyond the physical proximity of the location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10. The operation 520 may be performed, for example, by the controller 255 of the movable barrier operator 12. Alternatively, the operation 520 may be performed by the processor 355 of the remote control 30 or the processor 455 of the server computer 40 and communicated to the communication circuitry 250 of the movable barrier operator 12. The determination may be based, at least in part, on data obtained by any of the location determining techniques discussed above with respect to FIGS. 2-4. In response to a determination 520 that the remote control 30 is beyond the physical proximity, the movable barrier operator 12 is configured to effect operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 in combination with movement of the movable barrier 18 in operation 530. When the determination 520 indicates that the remote control 30 is within the physical proximity, in operation 540 the movable barrier operator 12 moves the movable barrier 18 and inhibits operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14.

With reference to FIG. 6, a method 600 is provided for operating the movable barrier operator 12 using the remote control 30. The method 600 includes operation 610 of receiving a user input at the user interface 352 of the remote control 30 and operation 620 of communicating with the movable barrier operator 12 in response to the receiving the user input. The method 600 further includes the operation 630 of determining whether the remote control 30 is within or beyond the physical proximity of the location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10. The operation 630 of determining may be performed, for example, by the processor 355 of the remote control 30. Alternatively, the operation 630 may be performed by the controller 255 of the movable barrier operator 12 or the processor 455 of the server computer 40 and communicated to the communication interface 350 of the remote control 30. The determination may be based, at least in part, on a locating indicium of the remote control 30. The locating indicium can be raw data obtained by any of the location determining techniques discussed above with respect to FIGS. 2-4, among others, or data representative of such a determination.

The method 600 further includes operation 640 of effecting operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 in combination with changing a state of the movable barrier 18 upon a determination of the remote control 30 being beyond the physical proximity. The method 600 includes operation 650 of not effecting operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 along with effecting movement of the movable barrier when the remote control 30 is determined to be within the physical proximity. Alternatively, operation 650 may include the remote control 30 communicating a non-notification instruction to the communication circuitry 250 of the movable barrier operator 12 to effect a change in state of the movable barrier 18 without operating the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14.

With reference to FIG. 7, a processor 455 of the server computer 40 may execute instructions stored on a non-transitory computer readable medium that cause the processor 455 to perform a method 700. The method 700 includes the operation 710 of communicating with the movable barrier operator 12 and the remote control 30 via the network 44, and operation 720 of receiving a state change request from the remote control 30. The method 700 additionally includes operation 730 of determining whether the remote control 30 is within or beyond the physical proximity of the location 80 associated with the movable barrier operator system 10. The operation 730 of determining may be performed, for example, by the processor 455 of the server computer 40. Alternatively, the operation 730 may be performed by the controller 255 of the movable barrier operator 12 or the processor 355 of the remote control 30 and communicated to the communication interface 450 of the server computer 40. The determination may be based, at least in part, on location data of the remote control 30. The location data can be raw data obtained by any of the location determining techniques discussed above with respect to FIGS. 2-4, among others, or data representative of such a determination.

Operation 740 includes effecting operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 in combination with changing a state of the movable barrier 18 upon a determination of the remote control 30 being beyond the physical proximity. At operation 750, inhibiting operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus 14 is performed in conjunction with effecting movement of the movable barrier upon the remote control 30 being determined to be within the physical proximity.

Those skilled in the art will recognize that a wide variety of modifications, alterations, and combinations can be made with respect to the above described embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention. For instance, although the described embodiments include a garage door, various types of movable barrier systems can employ these teachings, for example, swinging gates, rolling gates, rising gates, and the like. Such modifications, alterations, and combinations are to be viewed as being within the ambit of the inventive concept. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A remote control for a movable barrier operator system including a moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus, the remote control comprising: communication circuitry configured to send a communication to the movable barrier operator system to cause the movable barrier operator system to change a state of a movable barrier; the communication circuitry further configured to communicate at least one locating indicium for determination of whether the remote control is within or beyond a physical proximity of a location associated with the movable barrier operator system; a user interface configured to receive a user input that indicates a request to change the state of the movable barrier; and a processor operatively coupled to the communication circuitry and the user interface, the processor configured to: cause the communication circuitry to send the communication to the movable barrier operator system to cause the movable barrier operator system to change the state of the movable barrier upon the user interface receiving the user input; inhibit operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus in combination with the change of state of the movable barrier upon a determination of the remote control being within the physical proximity; and effectuate operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus in combination with the change of state of the movable barrier upon a determination of the remote control being beyond the physical proximity.
 2. The remote control of claim 1 wherein the communication circuitry is configured to receive the at least one locating indicium, and the processor is configured to determine whether the remote control is within or beyond the physical proximity based at least in part on the at least one locating indicium.
 3. The remote control of claim 2 wherein the processor is configured to inhibit operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus by including a non-notification indication in the communication to the movable barrier operator system.
 4. The remote control of claim 1 wherein the communication circuitry includes a navigation or position system receiver configured to output the at least one locating indicium, and wherein the processor is configured to determine whether the remote control is within or beyond the physical proximity based at least in part on the at least one locating indicium output from the navigation or position system receiver.
 5. The remote control of claim 1 wherein the communication circuitry includes an ultrasonic transducer configured to output the at least one locating indicium, the at least one locating indicium comprising an ultrasonic sound configured to be used in a determination by the processor of whether the remote control is within or beyond the physical proximity.
 6. The remote control of claim 1 wherein the communication circuitry is configured to receive the at least one locating indicium from at least one cellular network base station.
 7. The remote control of claim 1 wherein the communication is a radio frequency signal, and the processor is configured to cause the communication circuitry to transmit the radio frequency signal to the movable barrier operator system, the radio frequency signal including an identifier portion identifying the remote control and a rolling code portion.
 8. The remote control of claim 1 wherein the location associated with the movable barrier operator system includes a geofenced area and the processor is configured to: determine whether the remote control is in the geofenced area; and determine whether the remote control is within or beyond the physical proximity based at least in part on the determination of whether the remote control is in the geofenced area.
 9. The remote control of claim 1 wherein the processor is configured to cause the communication circuitry to transmit the at least one locating indicium to the movable barrier operator system.
 10. A server computer for facilitating operation, by a remote control, of a movable barrier operator system that includes a moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus, the server computer comprising: a communication interface configured to communicate with the movable barrier operator system and the remote control via a network, the communication interface configured to receive a state change request from the remote control; and a processor operatively coupled to the communication interface, the processor configured to cause the communication interface to communicate with the movable barrier operator system and cause a change of state of the movable barrier upon the communication interface receiving the state change request; the processor configured to cause the communication interface to communicate with the movable barrier operator system and inhibit operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus in combination with the change of state of the movable barrier upon a determination of the remote control being within a physical proximity of a location associated with the movable barrier operator system; the processor configured to cause the communication interface to communicate with the movable barrier operator system and effectuate operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus in combination with the change of state of the movable barrier upon a determination of the remote control being beyond the physical proximity.
 11. The server computer of claim 10 wherein the communication interface is configured to receive location data representative of a physical location of the remote control, and wherein the processor is configured to determine whether the remote control is within or beyond the physical proximity based at least in part on the location data.
 12. The server computer of claim 10 wherein the communication interface is further configured to receive data from a sensor, the data indicating a vehicle including the remote control is adjacent the sensor, the processor configured to determine whether the remote control is within or beyond the physical proximity based at least in part on the data from the sensor.
 13. The server computer of claim 10 wherein the processor is configured to cause the communication interface to communicate with the movable barrier operator system and inhibit operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus in combination with the change of state of the movable barrier by causing the communication interface to communicate a non-notification communication to the movable barrier operator system.
 14. The server computer of claim 10 wherein the communication interface is configured to communicate with the movable barrier operator system and the remote control via the network which includes the internet.
 15. The server computer of claim 10 wherein the location associated with the movable barrier operator system includes a geofenced area, the communication interface is configured to receive location data representative of a physical location of the remote control, the processor is configured to determine whether the remote control is within or beyond the physical proximity based at least in part on whether the remote control is in the geofenced area.
 16. A method of operating a movable barrier operator system including a moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus, the method comprising: at a remote control: receiving a user input at a user interface of the remote control, the user input requesting a change of state of a movable barrier of the movable barrier operator system; communicating, via communication circuitry of the remote control, at least one locating indicium for determination of whether the remote control is within or beyond a physical proximity of a location associated with the movable barrier operator system; causing the communication circuitry to send a communication to the movable barrier operator system, the communication configured to cause the movable barrier operator system to change a state of the movable barrier; effecting operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus in combination with the change of state of the movable barrier upon a determination of the remote control being beyond a physical proximity of the location associated with the movable barrier operator system; and inhibiting operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus in combination with the change of state of the movable barrier upon a determination of the remote control being within the physical proximity.
 17. The method of claim 16 wherein communicating the at least one locating indicium includes receiving, at the communication circuitry, the at least one locating indicium, the method further comprising: determining whether the remote control is within or beyond the physical proximity based at least in part on the at least one locating indicium.
 18. The method of claim 17 wherein inhibiting operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus comprises including a non-notification indication in the communication sent to the movable barrier operator system.
 19. The method of claim 16 wherein communicating the at least one locating indicium includes receiving the at least one locating indicium from a navigation or position system, the method further comprising: determining, using a processor of the remote control, whether the remote control is within or beyond the physical proximity based at least in part on the at least one locating indicium from the navigation or position system.
 20. The method of claim 16 wherein communicating the at least one locating indicium includes causing the communication circuitry to transmit an ultrasonic sound.
 21. The method of claim 16 wherein the communication circuitry is configured to receive the at least one locating indicium from at least one cellular network base station.
 22. The method of claim 16 wherein causing the communication circuitry to send the communication to the movable barrier operator system includes causing the communication circuitry to send the communication including an identifier portion identifying the remote control and a rolling code portion.
 23. The method of claim 16 wherein the location associated with the movable barrier operator system includes a geofenced area, the method further comprising: determining, using a processor of the remote control, whether the remote control is in the geofenced area; and determining, using the processor, whether the remote control is within or beyond the physical proximity based at least in part on whether the remote control is in the geofenced area.
 24. A non-transitory computer readable medium having instructions stored thereon that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform operations comprising: receiving a communication from a remote control via a network, the communication including at least a state change request, the state change request configured to cause a change of state of a movable barrier of a movable barrier operator system; effecting operation of a moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus in combination with the change of state of the movable barrier upon a determination that the remote control is beyond a physical proximity of a location associated with the movable barrier operator system; and inhibiting operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus in combination with the change of state of the movable barrier upon a determination that the remote control is within the physical proximity.
 25. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 24 wherein the operation of receiving the communication from the remote control further includes receiving location data of the remote control, the operations further comprising: determining whether remote control is within or beyond the physical proximity of the location based at least in part on the location data.
 26. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 24, the operations further comprising: receiving data from a sensor indicating a vehicle including the remote control is adjacent the sensor; and determining whether the remote control is within or beyond the physical proximity of the location based at least in part on the data from the sensor.
 27. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 24 wherein inhibiting operation of the moving-barrier imminent motion notification apparatus includes sending a non-notification communication to the movable barrier operator system.
 28. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 24 wherein receiving the communication from the remote control via the network includes receiving the communication from the remote control via the network including the internet.
 29. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 24 wherein the location associated with the movable barrier operator system includes a geofenced area, and wherein the communication from the remote control includes location data representative of a physical location of the remote control, the operations further comprising: determining whether the remote control is within or beyond the physical proximity based at least in part on whether the remote control is in the geofenced area. 